Get hands-on

Slideware won’t tell you if threat-led defence will work in your estate. A short, hands-on session will.

The fastest path is to start with the Community Edition, bring a couple of real use cases, and let your team see coverage and gaps against the behaviours you are about. No platform swap, no integration marathon, just evidence.

Here’s what a good session looks like.

You turn up with three things:

1. Your top 10 behaviours by risk: identity abuse, OAuth consent phishing, LSASS variants, lateral movement, covert exfil to cloud;
2. A simple inventory of the controls you run (EDR/SIEM/IDP/email/SaaS) and where their telemetry lands; and
3. One thorny use case that keeps coming back in incident review. We bring the buyer-community playbook: a curated Procedures Library, the mapping to ATT&CK, and an objective way to show coverage by behaviour instead of by product feature.

In the first 15 minutes, we configure a Threat Profile that reflects your business model and current campaign pressure. This isn’t a generic template; it’s the subset of techniques and procedures most likely to matter in your sector and environment.

The Community Edition gives you a clean canvas to see those behaviours laid out without pulling in any of your data yet, so security teams can evaluate the structure before committing pipelines.

Next, we walk a Coverage Map using what you already know about your stack:

“EDR X on endpoints A/B, SIEM Y ingesting Windows event families 4688/10/1102, IDP Z with sign-in logs, email gateway Q with user-report integration.”

Even at this metadata level, gaps jump out: missing identity or SaaS signals, endpoint policy sprawl that makes “global coverage” a fiction, or detections that exist but haven’t been validated in months.

The point is to anchor the conversation in behaviours (credential dumping procedures, token theft patterns, data staging to cloud) rather than arguing categories.

Then we show how procedures change the game. Instead of one broad “credential dumping” analytic, you see the procedure variants that matter in practice, direct LSASS handle access, comsvcs.dll minidump, procdump with obfuscated switches, each with the preconditions and telemetry notes you’d need to detect them.

That precision is what converts “interesting” into “shippable.” If you bring a recent public report, we’ll use NARC to extract the procedures live and link them to techniques, groups, and software so your detection engineers aren’t re-parsing prose.

If you want to go a step deeper in the same session, we bind required signals to your telemetry. Because the model is vendor-neutral, it describes what must be seen (process lineage, image loads, handle access, sign-in anomalies, API calls) and lets you decide how to satisfy it.

When a signal is missing, it surfaces as telemetry debt, a discrete configuration change or collector enablement, not a hidden assumption. You leave knowing exactly which behaviours could be covered this week versus which require a small telemetry uplift.

What you get at the end

You don't get a sales pitch; it’s a mini-portfolio: a behaviour-scoped Coverage Map, the first three procedure-level analytics you can implement, tuning notes (including documented exceptions like backup agents touching LSASS), and a validation fragment for each procedure so you can re-test on a schedule.

We also flag safe rationalisation opportunities where two tools cover the same procedures with similar confidence and response time—depth where it matters, savings where it’s redundant.

Moving from Community Edition to enterprise deployment is intentionally boring: export the behaviours and procedures you selected, connect the integrations you approve, and adopt the validation calendar that keeps drift under control.

Nothing breaks if you change a tool; the coverage source of truth is independent of any one product, which is exactly what boards and auditors want to see when they ask for threat-informed evidence.

For teams that prefer to start with a structured trial, the same artefacts roll straight into a POV: scope, success criteria, owners, and the change log that translates engineering progress into risk moved.

Security and privacy are straightforward: the hands-on session runs on your chosen tenant; you decide which integrations (if any) to enable; and you can keep it read-only to begin with. If you’re not ready to connect anything, you still get the behavioural map, procedure definitions, and the backlog of “cheapest risk reduction” tasks you can execute with your current stack.

What a successful POV feels like

Your engineers spend time on high-value logic, not parsing PDFs; hunts that worked once become engineered detections; exceptions live in the right place (e.g., documented LSASS access for a backup agent) instead of weakening an entire behaviour family; and when a new campaign drops you can answer “are we covered?” with specifics, not vibes.

Ready to take the next step?

Our POV is designed to prove value, promise it. Get started and book your session here.

Bring one recent public report and one painful use case. We’ll scope the behaviours, extract the procedures, bind them to your signals, and show you the first detections you can ship this week.

About this Sponsor

Built by the Team Behind ATT&CK® Tidal Cyber is powered by the practitioners who helped make MITRE ATT&CK® the industry’s common language for adversary behaviour.

With deep roots in ATT&CK stewardship, evaluation programs, and hands-on threat-informed defense, their team has productised the approach they pioneered, making it practical, scalable, and ready for your day-to-day defense.

Visit Site